Chat with us, powered by LiveChat

Baking Royal Commission – Can you sue a bank for bad financial advice?

Can you sue a bank for bad financial advice?

Attwood Marshall Lawyers Principal Jeff Garrett responds the the Royal Commission in Banking and the common question of – can you sue a bank for bad financial advice?

WHEN former Australian Competition and Consumer Commission chief Graeme Samuel met with bank executives who quizzed him on how to stop the relentless public mantra of “banks are bastards”, he frankly responded they should “stop being bastards!”

Reading his comments in a September Sydney Morning Herald newspaper, I was taken back to when I first started work as an articled clerk at Attwood Marshall Lawyers in 1981.

My master solicitor and founding partner Bob Marshall had a figurine of a lawyer on his desk with a caption reading: “sue the bastards!”.

It was a fitting mantra for our firm which continues to this day – here we are, nearly 40 years later, still suing illegitimate banks and insurance companies.

In our personal injuries department, we witness daily the trauma caused by unfair decisions made by insurers which cost our clients any chance of rehabilitation or quality of life.

Our commercial litigation team also sees daily the impact of financial advisers who, with their pursuit of personal commissions, have given incorrect advice.

So, of course, scandals of the banking, superannuation, insurance industries, and their ‘financial advisers’, come as little surprise to lawyers who “sue the bastards”.

"Sue the Bastards" figurine.

“Sue the Bastards” figurine.

 

As a parade of pathetically apologetic executives sat for a fresh round of Royal Commission (RC) hearings in in November, their testimonies only cemented my position on Australia’s finances sector.

Round seven of the RC was dedicated to policy questions arising from earlier rounds, giving executives a final opportunity to explain how they will fix misconduct endemic to the industry.

From bribery, forgery and ‘liar loaning’, to the exploitation of the disabled and the dead, countless of abhorrent practices rife within financial institutions have been exposed since the RC began.

In April, AMP’s chief lost his job after the insurer admitted to lying to regulators, while around the same time Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) admitted some of its financial planners charged fees from dead clients, in one case for as long as a decade.

Here are more detailed examples of the ways in which financial institutions have systematically robbed customers who trusted them of their investments, homes and life savings:

  1. Continuing to debit fees for financial advice to customers who were deceased.
  2. Negligent or fraudulent financial advice provided to bank customers by in house financial advisers who recommended investments in companies that were owned by the banks. The financial advice provided was often given to elderly customers to mortgaged their homes and placed the borrowed funds in risky investments. The purpose of the advice was so that the banks, financial advisers and related investment companies would receive huge fees and commissions from the transactions.
  3. Banks lending money to customers who clearly were in no financial position to repay those loans, including falsifying supporting documentation for their income and failing to properly investigate customers financial circumstances.
  4. Banks taking action against customers to effectively bankrupt them and sell up their properties even though there had been no default under the loans or any incidents of insolvency.
  5. There was evidence of the insurance arms of banks and finance companies deliberately denying legitimate claims made on insurance policies.
  6. Insurance companies breaching laws by cold calling customers and selling products to them over the telephone to lower socioeconomic and disadvantaged members of the community.

The RC was punctuated with a damning six month interim report handed down September 28 by former High Court Judge Kenneth Hayne, who heads the RC, finding two prominent themes emerging from his hearings: dishonesty and greed.

In trying to comprehend motive, Commissioner Hayne said “too often, the answer seems to be greed — the pursuit of short-term profit at the expense of basic standards of honesty… How else is charging continuing advice fees to the dead to be explained?”

No wonder clients are asking – can you sue a bank for bad financial advice?

An exert from Commissioner Hayne's interim report.

DAMNING: An excerpt from Commissioner Hayne’s interim report.

 

Weak responses to the banking Royal Commission

In November, submissions revealed former CBA chief Ian Narev received a performance bonus of 108% ($2.86 million) while a crisis unfolded over the bank’s botched life insurance policies, alleged money laundering, and claims its credit insurance was mis-sold.

Submissions also revealed the CBA board was dissatisfied with the performance of its former chairman David Turner and requested he return 40% of his annual fees but he refused and the board moved on, with the incident kept secret from shareholders.

Meanwhile, in the courts it is unlikely criminal sanctions will flow from findings of the RC and it remains to be seen whether Commissioner Haynes refers specific cases of misconduct to the Director of Public Prosecutions.

Even the Australian Securities and Investments Commission expressed in its submissions work had to be done to stop misconduct, but conceded there was no evidence to instruct as to how.

The problems of the sector are enshrined in its culture, which is why clients often ask us – can you sue a bank for bad financial advice?

This was highlighted not only the interim report of the RC, but also in the release of the new Banking Code of Practice and the release of a draft of the fourth edition of the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations, due for final release in early 2019.

In the latter,  its draft ‘Principle 3’ suggests that “a listed entity should instill and continually reinforce a culture across the organisation of acting lawfully, ethically and in a socially responsible manner”, however this draft Principal has been rejected by industry stakeholders.

With such a weak response from the authorities and reluctance from industry stakeholders to change, there is only one way to teach the banks a lesson.

And that is to sue them, and hit them where it hurts.

‘Can you sue a bank for bad financial advice?’ a common inquiry to Attwood Marshall Lawyers

The most common inquiry to Attwood Marshall Lawyers’ commercial ligation team, flowing on from the RC, is for grossly negligent or fraudulent financial advice, with clients asking ‘can you sue a bank for bad financial advice?’. The answer is ‘yes’.

Consumers have the right to be protected from unfair decisions made by financial institutions. Our lawyers are ready to fight for victims who have lost their homes, life savings, or quality of life, as a result of the systematic misconduct within the finances sector. There are many dispute resolution and court remedies for consumers who want to know if they can sue a bank for bad financial advice.

Who to contact to find out if you can you sue a bank for bad financial advice:

For a complimentary, obligation-free phone assessment of whether you are eligible for a No Win, No Fee claim for negligent or fraudulent financial advice contact:

Commercial Litigation Department Manager and Senior Paralegal, Amanda Heather, on direct line 07 5506 8245, email [email protected].

Find out more about our Commercial Litigation department here: goo.gl/Bp34tb. Download a Attwood Marshall Lawyers legal guide from a number of areas here: goo.gl/D9ADRVPlease click here to access our team brochure with details of our professional staff.

Author Contact Widget Form

Contact the Author

Sending
Jeff Garrett

Jeff Garrett

  • Legal Practice Director
  • Direct line: 07 5506 8201
  • Mobile: 0419 304 174